Skip to main content
HOME>Use Cases>Brand Abuse Takedowns: Lookalike Domains and Fake Accounts Handled by Policy
Use Case7 min read

Brand Abuse Takedowns: Lookalike Domains and Fake Accounts Handled by Policy

Reports of lookalike domains and impersonating accounts are classified under the takedown policy in one Kylon room, using evidence from X and LinkedIn. Agents propose each disposition and filing, and the brand protection lead approves before anything is filed or sent.

Get started
Kylon TeamProduct

Lookalike domains, fake recruiters and a queue that changes weekly

Brand abuse reports come from customers, staff and monitoring: a domain one letter off the company's, a login page that copies the real one, an account on X using the logo to sell fakes, a LinkedIn page posting jobs in the company's name. The takedown policy sorts each report into urgent phishing, standard takedown, monitor or no action, using what the report shows, how many people it reaches and how long it has been open.

The report register is in Attio, the policy and weekly notices are in Google Drive, the evidence sits on X and LinkedIn themselves, filings and status requests run through Gmail, and the team talks in Slack. When counsel widens the phishing definition mid-week, the reports it now covers have to be found and filed that day, not at the next weekly filing.

Who works in the room

People

  • Brand protection lead

    Approves every disposition and filing and sends each takedown request

  • Trademark counsel

    Owns the takedown policy and issues changes such as a wider phishing definition

  • Channel partnerships manager

    Confirms which sellers and accounts are authorized resellers

Agents

  • RyanReport classifier

    Classifies each report under the takedown policy from its Attio record and the evidence on X and LinkedIn, and records reach and days open

    AttioX (Twitter)LinkedInGoogle Drive
  • FinFiling desk

    Prepares takedown filings and the status replies requested on Gmail threads, one per thread, for a person to send

  • MycoDigest checker

    Checks the weekly filing digest against the register and tallies the close-out by disposition

    Google DriveAttio

The takedown queue runs in one Kylon room, and an automation opens the weekly filing every Monday morning. As the default agent, Ryan picks up any message that names no one, which is usually a question about how a report was classified. Filings and status replies go to Fin, and the weekly digest is Myco's to check. When Ryan moves a report to urgent, it mentions Fin with the evidence links and the policy clause, and Fin prepares the filing for the lead to approve and send.

One week of the queue

Every notice is read against the policy the room guidelines point to. Ryan reads X and LinkedIn for evidence only and never posts there.

  • Agent works
  • Person decides
  • Arrives or gets recorded
Scroll sideways to see the whole flow.
StageWhat happensWho actsWho decides
ClassificationEvery open report gets a disposition, its reach and its days since reportRyan, from Attio, X and LinkedInThe brand protection lead approves before Attio changes
Weekly filingFilings are prepared for every report the policy sends to takedown, and each status request gets one replyFinThe lead approves each filing and sends each reply
Digest reviewThe weekly filing digest is checked against the registerMycoThe lead corrects the digest
Wider phishing definitionEvery open report is re-checked, and any newly urgent report is filed the same dayRyan, then FinCounsel confirms the reading and the lead approves
Registrar sweepConfirmed suspensions are marked and the rest of the open queue is re-checkedRyanThe lead approves the changes
Authorized resellersAccounts confirmed as resellers are marked and re-checked under the full policyRyanThe partnerships manager confirms and the lead approves
Close-outFinal counts per disposition are tallied and close-out records created in AttioMycoThe lead signs off the week
Stages of one week of brand protection. Report ids, reach figures and dates in this example are illustrative.

A memo, a sweep and two resellers

A wider phishing definition changes the queue in one step. Counsel's memo might say a page that collects any personal details, not only passwords, now counts. Ryan re-checks every open report against the full policy, not only the ones the memo mentions, and any report that becomes urgent goes straight to Fin for a filing that day. A registrar sweep works the same way: confirmed suspensions are marked, and the rest of the queue is re-checked in case the sweep changed anything else.

An authorized reseller notice is the opposite case. The partnerships manager confirms that two accounts are legitimate resellers, and Ryan marks them in Attio. That does not close them. A reseller can still run a domain that copies the login page, so each one goes through the full policy again, and only what the policy clears comes off the queue.

What the checks catch

  • A domain report judged from a screenshot in an email instead of the fields on its Attio record
  • A report that became urgent under the wider phishing definition but is waiting for the weekly filing
  • An authorized reseller closed without a full re-check of its other activity
  • A status reply that rounds the reach figure or skips the ticket status, or a second reply on a thread that already has one

What stays with people

  • Approving every disposition and filing before Attio changes or anything is sent
  • Interpreting a policy memo when a report sits on the line
  • Sending every takedown request and status reply, which Fin drafts in Gmail
  • Confirming which accounts are authorized resellers

Integrations in this workflow

Kylon is not a brand protection service and it does not replace one. It sits across the register, the evidence and the mailbox the team already uses, and the room is where those pieces meet.

  • Attio holds the report register with disposition, reach, days since report and ticket status, plus the close-out records
  • X (Twitter) is read for evidence posts and account details, never posted to
  • LinkedIn is read for evidence on company pages that claim the brand
  • Google Drive keeps the takedown policy and every weekly notice and memo
  • Gmail carries takedown requests and status replies through drafts a person sends
  • Slack is where staff flag new reports and counsel posts urgent changes

Where to start

Start with one week of reports. Connect Attio and the Drive folder that holds the policy, and the room guidelines need one rule: any change to the policy or to a report's facts re-checks the whole open queue, and the brand protection lead approves every filing before it goes out.

“A wider definition only helps if the reports it now covers are filed the same day.”

Set it up with your agent

Open a new Room, add your agent and paste this prompt. It connects the tools, builds the App with you and asks for your rules one step at a time, and nothing goes out until a person approves it.

Set-up prompt

Your first company harness. Where humans and agents run your business together.

Get started

More Use Cases

View all

Records Retention: A Disposition Cycle Where Every Date Traces to Its Source

Each quarter, every in-scope Box record is dispositioned against the retention schedule, its classification, open legal holds and its own closure date in one Kylon room. Agents walk the records and check the certificate, and the records desk lead approves each write.

Legal & IPCompliance & risk

Litigation Docketing: Court Deadlines That Hold Up Through Stays and Extension Orders

Docket entries, court-day deadlines, calendar confirmations and clerk replies run through one Kylon room. Agents work the SharePoint docket list and the court orders in Outlook, and the docketing manager approves every date before it reaches a calendar.

Legal & IPCompliance & riskScheduling & dispatch