Skip to main content
HOME>Use Cases>Quarterly Access Review: Removal Windows That Stay Right When the Facts Change
Use Case9 min read

Quarterly Access Review: Removal Windows That Stay Right When the Facts Change

Account dispositions, removal windows, batch review and late HR, role matrix and attestation changes run through one Kylon room. Agents work the Salesforce, ClickUp and GitHub records, and the access review lead approves every change before it is written.

Get started
Kylon TeamProduct

Every account in every system, and each removal in the right window

A quarterly access review asks one question per account and system: should this person still have this access, at this level? The rows sit on a tracking object in Salesforce, one per account and system pair. The answers come from the access review policy, the role matrix and the HR leaver list in Google Drive, plus open access exceptions recorded as GitHub issues and removal tickets in ClickUp.

The first pass is rarely what goes wrong. What goes wrong is everything after it. HR corrects the leaver list, vendor management extends a contractor, security publishes a new role matrix, and late manager attestations arrive the week before closeout. Each one changes a few dispositions, and each changed disposition may already have a removal window written on its ticket. A window left in place for an account that is now retained turns into a removal that should never happen.

Who works in the room

People

  • Access review lead

    Owns the quarter's review, approves every disposition and window, and signs the closeout

  • System owners

    Confirm removal windows for their system and carry out each removal

  • HR and vendor management

    Send leaver and contractor corrections and confirm the corrected status

  • Security team

    Publishes the role matrix and rules on segregation of duties conflicts

Agents

  • RyanReview coordinator

    Disposes each account row from the policy, role matrix and leaver list, schedules removals into windows and records each approved change

    SalesforceClickUpGitHubGoogle DriveNotion
  • AdaBatch reviewer

    Checks each generated removal batch line by line and re-checks every re-derivation before it goes to the lead

    Google DriveSalesforceClickUp
  • MycoCorrection threads

    Reads HR and vendor management mail, drafts the confirmations they ask for, and brings system owners' questions into the review

Unaddressed questions about an account go to Ryan, the room's default agent; batch questions go to Ada and mail goes to Myco. Ryan writes to Salesforce, ClickUp and GitHub under a lasting grant from the access review lead, and only after the lead approves each change in the thread. Myco drafts Gmail replies through the account of the person it works for. When HR's corrections arrive, Myco opens a thread for Ryan whose first message quotes them, so each re-derivation starts from the source.

Seven stages, one quarter

The policy defines the rule order and the recording conventions, and the room guidelines point every agent at the current version of both. Each stage stops at a person before anything is written.

  • Agent works
  • Person decides
  • Arrives or gets recorded
Scroll sideways to see the whole flow.
StageWhat happensWho actsWho decides
DispositionsEvery account row gets a disposition from the policy, the role matrix, the leaver list and any open GitHub exception or ClickUp ticketRyanThe access review lead approves before Salesforce, ClickUp or GitHub is updated
Removal schedulingEach remove or disable row is placed in a removal window, recorded on its ClickUp ticketRyanSystem owners confirm the window fits their change calendar
Batch reviewThe generated removal batch is checked line by line, and accounts with no window this cycle are left out of the corrected batchAdaThe access review lead approves the corrected batch
HR and contractor correctionsNamed accounts are re-derived through the full rule order, and any window that no longer applies is undoneRyan, then Myco for the repliesHR and vendor management confirm, and the lead sends the replies
Role matrix updateEvery row on hold, escalated or marked for excess rights is re-derived under the new matrixRyan, checked by AdaThe security team confirms how the matrix applies
Late attestationsNamed accounts are re-derived with the attestation as one input, alongside the segregation of duties rulingRyanThe security team rules on each conflict
CloseoutPer-system totals are counted from the final dispositions in Salesforce and posted on each closeout ticketRyanThe access review lead signs the closeout
Stages of one quarterly access review. Account IDs, windows and systems in this example are illustrative.

Late corrections, a new matrix and an attestation that is not a verdict

Corrections are applied narrowly but thoroughly. Ryan re-derives only the accounts a correction names, and runs each one from the top of the rule order rather than adjusting the old answer. If an account moves from remove to retain, its window is undone on the ClickUp ticket with a note citing the correction, and Ada confirms it is gone from the corrected batch rather than listed with an empty window.

A manager attestation confirms that a person still needs access. It does not settle the level of that access. An attested account can still hold rights the new role matrix no longer grants, or sit in a segregation of duties conflict the security team has not ruled on. Ryan records the attestation and finishes the rule order, and the result names the rule that decided it. Every agent turn that writes to Salesforce or ClickUp keeps a run history an auditor can follow.

What the checks catch

  • An account a manager attested whose rights exceed what the current role matrix grants, which stays a revoke-excess case
  • A removal window still on a ClickUp ticket after the account's disposition changed to retain
  • An account in the corrected batch with no window this cycle, which is dropped from the batch instead of listed as none
  • A row held or escalated under the old matrix that the new matrix now decides, re-derived rather than left waiting
  • Closeout totals counted from first-pass dispositions instead of the final records in Salesforce

What stays with people

  • Approving every disposition and window before Salesforce, ClickUp or GitHub is written
  • Carrying out each removal in the target system, which the system owner does
  • Ruling on segregation of duties conflicts, which belongs to the security team
  • Sending replies to HR and vendor management, and signing the closeout

Integrations in this workflow

Kylon is not an identity governance product and it does not replace one. It works across the systems the review already touches and keeps the reasoning for each account in the thread where it was approved.

  • Salesforce holds the access tracking object, one row per account and system, with its disposition
  • GitHub holds the access exception issues, which get a label and a comment as dispositions are approved
  • ClickUp holds the removal tickets, the batch review ticket and one closeout ticket per system
  • Notion keeps the system inventory, with each system's owner and the person who approves removals
  • Google Drive keeps the policy, both versions of the role matrix, the leaver list and each generated batch
  • Gmail carries the HR and vendor management threads, answered with drafts a person sends
  • Slack is where system owners confirm windows and flag a removal that would break a running job

Where to start

Start with one quarter and the two or three systems with the most accounts. Connect the Salesforce tracking object, point the room at the Drive folder with the policy and role matrix, and make this the first room guideline: no disposition, window or ticket changes until the access review lead approves it in the thread, and only system owners carry out removals.

“The hardest part of the quarter was undoing the right windows when the facts changed. Now each undo has a source and an approver.”

Set it up with your agent

Open a new Room, add your agent and paste this prompt. It connects the tools, builds the App with you and asks for your rules one step at a time, and nothing goes out until a person approves it.

Set-up prompt

Your first company harness. Where humans and agents run your business together.

Get started

More Use Cases

View all

Clinical Site Monitoring: A Monthly Visit Plan That Holds Up When Things Change

Site dispositions, monitor assignments, schedule reviews and mid-cycle changes run through one Kylon room. Agents work the Salesforce and Box records, and the desk lead approves every assignment before a visit is booked.

Healthcare & life sciencesScheduling & dispatchCompliance & risk

Cold Chain Excursion Review: Every Shipment Dispositioned Against Its Stability Budget

Logger files, stability budgets, QA reviewer assignments and carrier claims run through one Kylon room. Agents total the minutes out of range and check the manifest, and the QA lead approves every release and reject before a record changes.

Healthcare & life sciencesCompliance & risk